Pensadores del conflicto: Hannah Arendt e Isaiah Berlin
Loading...
Date
2019
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Revista del Centro de Estudios Superiores Navales
Abstract
En el presente ensayo se hace una revisión teórica del concepto de conflicto desde la perspectiva de la filosofía política. El ulterior esfuerzo que anima a esta revisión, que se formulará en varias entregas, es suministrar, de manera sucinta, fuentes y marcos teóricos que permitan pensar con amplitud y complejidad los problemas políticos contemporáneos a través de uno de los núcleos conceptuales del pensamiento político, para, en consecuencia, poder ofrecer respuestas informadas, creativas, razonadas y razonables. En esta primera entrega se aborda la cuestión del conflicto y de las causas de sus existencia en dos pensadores de mediados del siglo XX, Hannah Arendt e Isaiah Berlin, para ello se recurrió al
análisis de sus obras representativas y a la comparación de las apreciaciones que sobre el conflicto tuvo cada pensador. Además, sus valoraciones se orientan brevemente la cuestión de la diferencia que marcó a los pensadores postestructuralistas, en este caso a Lyotard, bajo la hipótesis de que diferencia es un concepto más apropiado para nuestros tiempos, puesto que profundiza y expande la dimensión libertaria del conflicto. El resultado aparece como conclusión sintética del abordaje de cada uno de los autores.
This essay is a theoretical review of the concept of conflicto, made from the perspective of the political philosophy. The subsequent effort that animates this review, which will be formulated in several submissions, is to provide, in a succinct way, sources and theoretical frameworks that allow to think broadly and complexity contemporary political problems through one of the conceptual cores of the political thought, Therefore, we can offer informed, creative, reasoned and reasonable answers. In this first submission, the question of the conflict and the causes of its existence are addressed in two thinkers of the mid-twentieth century, Hannah Arendt and Isaiah Berlin, for this purpose the analysis of their representative works was used, also the comparison. In addition, their assessments are oriented to the question of the difference that marked the post-structuralist thinkers, in this case Lyotard, under the hypothesis that difference is a more appropriate concept for our times, since it deepens and expands the dimension libertarian of the conflict. The result appears as a synthetic conclusion of the approach of each of the authors.
This essay is a theoretical review of the concept of conflicto, made from the perspective of the political philosophy. The subsequent effort that animates this review, which will be formulated in several submissions, is to provide, in a succinct way, sources and theoretical frameworks that allow to think broadly and complexity contemporary political problems through one of the conceptual cores of the political thought, Therefore, we can offer informed, creative, reasoned and reasonable answers. In this first submission, the question of the conflict and the causes of its existence are addressed in two thinkers of the mid-twentieth century, Hannah Arendt and Isaiah Berlin, for this purpose the analysis of their representative works was used, also the comparison. In addition, their assessments are oriented to the question of the difference that marked the post-structuralist thinkers, in this case Lyotard, under the hypothesis that difference is a more appropriate concept for our times, since it deepens and expands the dimension libertarian of the conflict. The result appears as a synthetic conclusion of the approach of each of the authors.
Description
Keywords
Conflicto, pluralidad, pluralismo, juicio, diferencia, Conflict, plurality, pluralism, judgment, difference